Blog @ Fordham IPLJ
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal
March 9, 2023
Last month, Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida mediated a discussion exploring how the law of defamation, including the longstanding “actual malice” standard of fault for media defendants, could be amended
March 8, 2023
The use of rap lyrics against artists has become a high-profile issue in light of rapper Yung Thug’s criminal trial and has caused some in the entertainment industry to speak
March 7, 2023
After years of consideration, the FDA’s recently released guidance on clinical decision support software blindsided the healthcare tech community, threatening to significantly expand the scope of regulations that govern technology
March 6, 2023
A leaked update to Dungeons and Dragons’ Open Game License set the game’s community on fire. What happened?
March 5, 2023
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the landmark provision that shields companies from liability for user-generated content, has been the subject of much debate recently. While it is often
March 3, 2023
Bitcoin is synonymous with cryptocurrency. But a mystery has always surrounded Bitcoin: who is its founder? And if we know who it is—should they have the copyright to Bitcoin?
March 2, 2023
Cutting scenes from the final movie may be the result of creative decisions. Yet, this creative discretion may be misrepresentative. For those consumers, out of sight does not mean out
February 28, 2023
SCOTUS has agreed to adjudicate a canine-centered conundrum, granting cert in November of last year to hear the trademark infringement claim of whiskey giant Jack Daniel’s against dog toy manufacturer
February 27, 2023
In November 2022, ChatGPT, a form of artificial intelligence capable of creating original works, was released to the public. Lawmakers have yet to reveal how they will address the emergence
February 25, 2023
In May, the SDNY denied a motion to dismiss Hermès’ complaint against artist Mason Rothschild surrounding his collection of “MetaBirkin” NFTs. The court held that Rothschild’s digital images could constitute
Loading new posts...
No more posts